Supreme Court Ruling on Lease Extensions for Public Land: What It Means – An Analysis of The Supreme Court Decision in Sehmi & Another V Tarabana Company Limited & 5 Others
The first proprietors applied for extension of the lease three months prior to the lapse of the period in 2001. However, the Commissioner for Lands neither approved nor declined the application for extension despite seeking for objections from the Directors of City Planning and Survey respectively. The first proprietors continued to stay on the land while paying the periodic rates to the Commissioner for Lands. However, in 2009, they were forcefully evicted from the land by agents of the Nairobi City Planning. The land had been allocated to Rospatech Limited who later transferred it to Tarabana Company Limited. The first proprietors challenged the illegal eviction by filing a suit at the Environment and Land Court.